Despite having denied that the NFI is limited to actual inconsistencies, the NFI has once again reverted to pretending that its matches indicate inconsistencies requiring investigation. This despite having emailed participants to ask them to modify the 'privacy notices' they produce.
I don't think it is a coincidence that it is publishing this 'lie' when the government is debating the future of the NFI. I think the truth is a somewhat inconvenient aspect of this whole thing which it would clearly be useful to the Audit Commission to suppress. Perhaps the truth is too 'comprehensive' for its liking and it prefers to be economical with this commodity?
The document is not signed, so we have to blame the bosses: ie the Chair, the Chief Executive, and the 'team, which comprises a list of names I have encountered before, mostly on legally inaccurat/misleading reports and minutes referring to 'unambiguous' matching when the exercise is nothing of the sort.
Darren Shillingdon
Yvonne Addison
Sally Gubbins
Nathan Boon
Robert Hammond (who we know puts out false information about council tax discounts)
and a new one
Nathan Nash.
He studied Geography at Cardiff. Well qualified for the job, then?
